From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46404 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 17:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46357 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 17:31:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=cherry, awaits X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:31:50 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buNNY-0003pz-9h for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:31:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buNNY-0003pv-6W; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:31:44 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3293 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1buNNX-0003lb-A0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:31:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83insxa2z2.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: qiyaoltc@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Pedro Alves on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:10:43 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update gnulib to current upstream master Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1476285429-24489-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <0d295a85-e43a-6b6c-aef1-7f61a9ef5704@redhat.com> <83pon5a4ma.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 > Cc: qiyaoltc@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:10:43 +0100 > > > I agree. If nothing else, it solves the 2 problems I had with the > > recent MinGW runtime when building GDB 7.12, see > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-10/msg00007.html > > For 7.12, might it be a better idea to cherry pick your fix to > the branch though? The update is not that large, but there's > still a good amount of churn all around. That could be done, yes. Which reminds me: the other part, which is is here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00193.html still awaits approval...