From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id cMKwEicwEmAkXwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:31:51 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4A3211EF80; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:31:51 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CA41E940 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:31:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6385C398BC3B; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:31:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6385C398BC3B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611804710; bh=/XAUn8xebwfMCoUy7TVIEWb5ytQUACVB05vcuHYB4+0=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=d1TfaXhBkaaRJ8n3Fv+dvawIONzd0+8e6gpTUDLB0vREVQ9XZIUFfee5mgQdbVMjl ANUt7Hzhn/wi4/lkzDWrl+85h5Iwd5HlK2t5Z1fvwRvGF9n+8//cWUNQAG+OSf29CO /O0TvOTIXL7kza8BUzbrJQXJQuHP5X6Revhfvo18= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAD4398BC3B for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:31:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7CAD4398BC3B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4y25-0000Ml-KA; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:31:47 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2864 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l4y24-000389-Ea; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:31:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:31:59 +0200 Message-Id: <83im7hzqhc.fsf@gnu.org> To: Luis Machado In-Reply-To: <20210127202112.2485702-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado via Gdb-patches on Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:21:10 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions References: <20210127202112.2485702-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20210127202112.2485702-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:21:10 -0300 > From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches > > Document the changes to the "print" and "x" commands to support memory > tagging. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado > > * gdb.texinfo (Data): Document memory tagging changes to the "print" > command. > (Examining Memory): Document memory tagging changes to the "x" > command. > (Memory Tagging): Update with more information on changes to the "x" > and "print" commands. This was already approved, right?