From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25426 invoked by alias); 23 May 2009 11:26:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25417 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2009 11:26:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:26:47 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KK300800GXX0B00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 14:26:44 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.115.215]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KK300AHMH4J9J30@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 14:26:44 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: [RFA] Fix DJGPP register numbering with COFF and stabs debug info To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83hbzct5zg.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 The default register numbering for COFF and stabs is wrong for DJGPP native debugging, since the native compiler is GCC. This patch fixes that. OK to commit? 2009-05-23 Eli Zaretskii * i386-tdep.c (i386_go32_init_abi): Use SVR4 register numbering for stabs and COFF debug info. --- i386-tdep.c~1 2009-04-29 13:40:00.314875000 +0300 +++ i386-tdep.c 2009-05-23 14:16:56.437500000 +0300 @@ -2598,6 +2598,13 @@ i386_go32_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info /* DJGPP does not support the SSE registers. */ tdep->num_xmm_regs = 0; set_gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch, I386_NUM_GREGS + I386_NUM_FREGS); + + /* Native compiler is GCC, which uses the SVR4 register numbering + even in COFF and STABS. See the comment in i386_gdbarch_init, + before the calls to set_gdbarch_stab_reg_to_regnum and + set_gdbarch_sdb_reg_to_regnum. */ + set_gdbarch_stab_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, i386_svr4_reg_to_regnum); + set_gdbarch_sdb_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, i386_svr4_reg_to_regnum); }