From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30107 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2009 20:49:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 30098 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2009 20:49:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:49:13 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KPT00B00QO8M500@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:49:10 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.163]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KPT000TUR5XDY20@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:49:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:49:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec In-reply-to: To: Tom Tromey Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83hbv91a2i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <19113.58116.381538.294631@totara.tehura.co.nz> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:40:23 -0600 > > Nick> Existing documentation uses @var for field names, while new uses @samp. > > Yeah. @var seems clearly wrong there. > I will change the new code though. What part of the patch does this refer to? I didn't yet read the patch carefully, but just skimming it I don't see any wrong @var. Please be more specific.