From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4245 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2009 18:26:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4222 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2009 18:26:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:26:05 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KQ400700OG1YW00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:26:02 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.38.189]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KQ400F1JOJDPBP0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:26:02 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix "show convenience" test In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0909171057j6c6ac9e3neb5f46912b10efe9@mail.gmail.com> To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83hbv1whqa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200909152132.15317.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909161416.22783.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83ab0uyfzk.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0909170937t14e62114o9a74d1ef110643b1@mail.gmail.com> <83iqfhwkhh.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0909171057j6c6ac9e3neb5f46912b10efe9@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:57:31 -0700 > From: Paul Pluzhnikov > Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The attachment was actually text, just base64-encoded: > > > > Lately, my eyes lost their ability to read base64 without help ;-) > > You appear to be using emacs; surely it can help? Sure, but it needs to be asked nicely ;-) > I've used VM in the past, and had no problems decoding base64 (or anything > else for that matter). There are no problems to do that in any of the Emacs MUAs, except that in my setup this is done only upon request. Imagine me scrolling through 100-odd mails, and you will understand why I sometimes let the encoded ones woosh by. > How old is base64 now, has it hit 15 years yet? "text based mail reader" > my left foot, there's nothing to prevent a text based mail reader from > decoding mail in a 15 year old standard. There's that thing called ``viri'' and ``Trojans''. I guess they never heard about them.