From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74694-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24218 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2010 18:09:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 24208 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2010 18:09:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:12 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6D00600U6B9Q00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:08:29 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.19.236]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6D006GQUE40420@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:08:29 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix for 'too much spew with "set verbose on"'
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinY+o2nw0Ld5dq5Grkd05Oyc+ZTiDE=7N0XdDj_@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83hbjgc06b.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <AANLkTinY+o2nw0Ld5dq5Grkd05Oyc+ZTiDE=7N0XdDj_@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2

> From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:24:38 -0700
> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,        Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
> 
> +Set whether to show processing of libthread_db."), _("\
> +Show whether to show processing of libthread_db."), _("\

"Show whether to show" sounds awkward.  How about

  "Show whether to be verbose during processing of libthread_db."

(and a similar change for the "Set" part)?

> +@kindex maint set show-libthread-db-processing
> +@kindex maint show show-libthread-db-processing
> +@cindex processing @code{libthread_db}
> +@item maint set show-libthread-db-processing
> +@itemx maint show show-libthread-db-processing
> +Control whether to show various internal events while searching for and
> +using @code{libthread_db}.  Use @code{ON} to enable, @code{OFF} to disable.
>  @end table

This part is fine.

Thanks.