From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76901-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31238 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2010 20:19:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 31204 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2010 20:19:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:18:57 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LD800H00AUQJP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:18:08 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.142.197]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LD800GV8B23VU90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:18:04 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:19:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: NEWS entry for next-over-throw patch
In-reply-to: <m3hbelzd4r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83hbel1iwm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3sjy61x3v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83zkse10cl.fsf@gnu.org> <m3hbelzd4r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:39:00 -0700
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> Eli> Does this mean the feature will only work with GCC-compiled programs?
> Eli> If so, perhaps we should say that more explicitly.
> 
> It will work with any program that uses exceptions where the exception
> unwinder defines a particular debugging hook.
> 
> Right now this hook only appears in libgcc.
> 
> It would probably work right now with other compilers on systems using
> a new-enough libgcc.  E.g., it might work for other compilers on Fedora.

Then I guess your wording is okay as it is.  Thanks.