From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78316-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21937 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 19:40:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 21929 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 19:40:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:40:28 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LGQ00G004FUGN00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:40:15 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.187.92]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LGQ00FVR6MYV4L0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:40:15 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:46:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [unavailable values part 1, 06/17] array element repeats, <unavailable> confused with 0.
In-reply-to: <4D5C14C8.9050904@vmware.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83hbc3wyxs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201102071430.49735.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102151828.36004.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110216092850.GA5399@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201102161015.19382.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110216103302.GB22317@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D5C14C8.9050904@vmware.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:17:44 -0800
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> CC: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> >>  <http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EightyColumnRule>
> > 
> > OK, it seems 80 columns is OK.
> 
> No way.  Emacs wraps at 79, so 80 is definitely *not* ok by me...

Actually, Emacs wraps at 79 only on text-mode terminals these days.
In a GUI session, it wraps at 80.