From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1134 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2011 19:56:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1125 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2011 19:56:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:56:24 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LVP00J003DRJ200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:56:23 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.128.163]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LVP00IUC3DXZ390@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:56:23 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:56:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) In-reply-to: <201112041901.04599.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: hal9000ed2k@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83hb1gaz88.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83liqsb7mx.fsf@gnu.org> <201112041901.04599.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:01:04 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > tromey@redhat.com, > dje@google.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > pmuldoon@redhat.com, > brobecker@adacore.com, > drow@false.org, > jan.kratochvil@redhat.com > > On Sunday 04 December 2011 18:41:16, iam ahal wrote: > > > of without-compilation-directory. > > At the risk of being bikesheddy, I suggest "no-compilation-directory" instead. > 5 whole letters less. :-) Somehow it sounds more gdb-idiomatic to me. Fine with me, but it still falls short of explaining what exactly is removed from the file name.