From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-87156-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9105 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2012 17:17:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 9097 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2012 17:17:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:17:31 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LXW00300HTA8J00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:17:30 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.91.164]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LXW003DQIP39R40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:17:28 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:18:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc v2][4/6] Readlink as file I/O target operation
In-reply-to: <201201161407.q0GE7htU029197@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83hazvin2n.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201201161407.q0GE7htU029197@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:07:43 +0100 (CET)
> From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:32:23 +0100 (CET)
> > > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > > I'll be happy to use "filename" instead, but the currently existing
> > > packets (open, unlink) also use "pathname" today.  Should those be
> > > changed to "filename" too?
> > 
> > In general, yes.  But I cannot in good faith ask you to do that as
> > part of this patch.  So let's make a first small step in this
> > 1000-mile journey by using "filename" in just this part.  I'll add to
> > my todo to fix the rest, if no one beats me to it.
> 
> Fair enough.  Appended below is the updated doc part of the patch,
> just making the pathname -> filename change for readlink.

Fine with me, thanks.