From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 7.7 crashes on LTO-built executable
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ha84ruai.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ob2ct9ua.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:22:21 -0700
>
> I don't know what code path hits this, but basically something is not
> calling record_debugformat when it ought to. So one way to fix the bug
> would be to track down what this is. I would probably start by finding
> where the symtab in question was allocated.
OK, I'll look around some more.
> The current design seems fragile in that it requires sprinkling these
> calls to record_debugformat all around.
That's true (I see gobs of calls to that function), but all but one of
these calls are from coff_start_symtab, and the argument 'format' is
NULL, as expected. There's only one call to record_debugformat from
the DWARF 2 reader, the one I described in my original message. This
is expected in a single-objfile program, right?
Assuming my guess is correct, and the reason for the problem is that
the only objfile GDB sees has its name set to some temporary file
rather than the source file of the program, where's the code which
tries to match the current source file with the known objfiles? I
assume that when I type "info source", GDB looks for the information
about the current source file -- where is the code which does that?
> I did find this comment in buildsym.c:
>
> /* Save the debug format string (if any) in the symtab. */
> symtab->debugformat = subfile->debugformat;
>
> And it does seem that nothing tries to ensure that a subfile's
> debugformat is set. So perhaps fixing it at the printf site is fine; or
> alternatively changing the field's initialization in start_subfile.
> Though it seems better to try to fix the value properly; since "unknown"
> can't ever really be correct -- it it's unknown one wonders how gdb
> could have read it :)
I think GDB really doesn't know it have read the DWARF 2 info in this
case. I think it uses the COFF information (which includes line
table, right?).
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 17:37 Eli Zaretskii
2014-02-12 17:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-02-12 19:22 ` Tom Tromey
2014-02-12 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2014-02-12 20:05 ` Tom Tromey
2014-02-12 20:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-02-15 16:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-02-12 20:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83ha84ruai.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox