From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14779 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2014 12:55:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14762 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2014 12:55:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:55:05 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF200600Z0D9D00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:02 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF2006CFZVP7760@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:55:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't set CC in config/i386/go32.mh In-reply-to: <87y4rchekw.fsf@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83h9y0fwtu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1416041503-29957-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83y4rcg7ns.fsf@gnu.org> <20141115101405.GE5774@adacore.com> <83r3x4g2bv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4rchekw.fsf@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 > From: Yao Qi > CC: Joel Brobecker , > Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:45:51 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > How come this never came up before, then? AFAIR, Pedro built the > > DJGPP port several times. > > I don't know. I built DJGPP port some time ago (last year maybe?), but > I didn't see this problem before either. OK, I guess we go for it, then. Thanks.