From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Cc: tom@tromey.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] gdb: Rewrite argument handling for user-defined commands
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 06:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h8j0tsfg.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907224721.GH22193@embecosm.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Fri, 7 Sep 2018 23:47:21 +0100)
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 23:47:21 +0100
> From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
>
> 1. Arguments are separated by whitespace,
>
> 2. Everything within matched single or double quotes is a single
> argument.
>
> 3. After a quoted region you still need whitespace to split the
> arguments, so >>'abc'def<< will be a single argument, >>abcdef<<.
>
> 4. Within double quotes, a backslash can be used to escape a double
> quotes, so >>"\"this is one\""<< will give >>"this is one"<<.
>
> 5. Within single quotes backslash does NOT escape a single quote, so
> a single quote always ends a quoted block, so >>'this is\'<< will
> pass the argument >>this is\<<. I'm not 100% committed to this idea,
> and can make this like double quotes if that is preferred.
Why did you decide on this exception for single quotes? Are there any
downsides to having \' mean a literal ' inside '..' quoted arguments?
If there is no downside, I think it would be a better UX to have both
kinds of quotes behave identically wrt escapes.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-08 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-15 14:39 [PATCH 0/2] gdb: Allow parenthesis to group arguments to " Andrew Burgess
2018-08-15 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] gdb: Make testnames unique in gdb.base/commands.exp Andrew Burgess
2018-08-30 15:26 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <eaa6d3a2975194a7ef3a2aa40e335c7986b205d8.1534343840.git.andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
2018-08-15 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] gdb: Allow parenthesis to group arguments to user-defined commands Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-25 19:32 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-08-25 20:53 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-08-25 22:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-28 15:54 ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-28 18:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-28 20:29 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-08-28 23:29 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-30 2:19 ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-30 21:19 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-08-31 20:59 ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-01 11:10 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-09-01 14:20 ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-01 15:36 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-08-30 2:26 ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-06 23:29 ` [PATCHv2] gdb: Rewrite argument handling for " Andrew Burgess
2018-09-07 6:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-09-07 20:36 ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-07 22:47 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-09-08 6:27 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2018-09-08 5:35 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-09-08 14:33 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83h8j0tsfg.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox