From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id bPo+NpGiSWKgbgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:35:13 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C9A701F327; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:35:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274291E787 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713983858418 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 13:35:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 713983858418 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1648992912; bh=5SipeOaxIzdf9hKw55mIrvOxzoTrSXlFJF0qY0iDgZ0=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=Y/DnvBbMGpO3Hq9AYjbGv745Y+/ZLQiUUq4ssuYs+Ks3b1y9hrxVSmc4RhvwG6CQV XuSkxMtFtJyoMdsMD8jtKWn6RavtSpVmqyyHbeShfuX0VlqRby+UdLxZ5/WvSze4zU c4N5++hEa7haXFifZcFS1S9SLK5P4vj7pwgxQyko= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384253858D37 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 13:34:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 384253858D37 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=36326 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb0NZ-00009s-2r; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:34:53 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3007 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb0NY-0006fI-IW; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:34:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 16:34:48 +0300 Message-Id: <83h77affyf.fsf@gnu.org> To: Hannes Domani In-Reply-To: <1379565857.1750775.1648990951974@mail.yahoo.com> (message from Hannes Domani on Sun, 3 Apr 2022 13:02:31 +0000 (UTC)) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <20220320055815.2A90FA4D6C@takamaka.home> <83sfr4a93r.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmm8a7gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83o81sa6nu.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilrzap07.fsf@gnu.org> <83mth67i8m.fsf@gnu.org> <72ad3448-0ff0-f36c-d1f3-cc194c0503b8@palves.net> <83ee2i72vl.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfqx864d.fsf@redhat.com> <83fsmx59wi.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee2h59m2.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmm096dc.fsf@redhat.com> <83zgl44w1m.fsf@gnu.org> <1379565857.1750775.1648990951974@mail.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: pedro@palves.net, aburgess@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 13:02:31 +0000 (UTC) > From: Hannes Domani > Cc: "brobecker@adacore.com" , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , > "pedro@palves.net" > > I just finished my build of gdb 12 branch with a mingw-w64 gcc, and I also have that > problem when starting gdb with -i=mi: > > (gdb) > r -Q > &"g\n" > &"Ambiguous command \"g\": gcore, generate-core-file, goto-bookmark, gr, gu, guile, guile-repl.\n" > ^error,msg="Ambiguous command \"g\": gcore, generate-core-file, goto-bookmark, gr, gu, guile, guile-repl." > > > If I "delete" that not-visible 'g' with backspace before I enter the command, it works again. > So there definitely is something weird going on here. Thanks. It is therefore strange that Joel reported he and others didn't see this in their MinGW builds.