From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id sZ61M4p702PepyIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:21:46 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C493A1E128; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:21:46 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=h2p8sd2H; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 550A51E110 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:21:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1033858C20 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:21:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B1033858C20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1674804105; bh=JdoEtaVd8ZVPVfIhVhGx6pVA7wVMcQdscAmXFhGVblU=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=h2p8sd2HKt1S8dgLcjkLIqmUbaBXDQO9mnTCN6WPRqY8X8olKKgAsCrXeGE1CzZle UHHXnbVe75sqsPfXnM1Fv36toJLj4imb+TIDp0x49ZmPhscqDPdewi6nwBe1dexkKT giJUr8V9SWCOqgk/9aQ6yzMFQt/eQF5gPFqnxDjQ= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A833858D20 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:21:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 51A833858D20 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLJ37-00006R-HZ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:21:25 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLJ35-0007Wo-Pp; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:21:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:21:09 +0200 Message-Id: <83h6wccuje.fsf@gnu.org> To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20230126231200.5549-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> (message from Palmer Dabbelt on Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:12:00 -0800) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/doc: The RISC-V vector registers didn't change References: <20230126231200.5549-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:12:00 -0800 > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt > From: Palmer Dabbelt > > When we merged the GDB vector register support we did it a bit early, > just eating the risk in the very unlikely case that the vector register > names changed. They didn't, so we can now remove the caveat in the docs > that they might. > --- > gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) This is OK, thanks.