From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62843-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9819 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2009 18:38:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 9810 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2009 18:38:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:37:56 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KI100E00Y48SN00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:37:20 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.240.185]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KI1002WRYE46X70@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:37:19 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:38:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [commit] Fix prototype related breakage in go32-nat.c
In-reply-to: <m3ab6ko5y0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83fxgco0wu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <834owvoyvb.fsf@gnu.org> <200904111916.10115.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83ws9rng84.fsf@gnu.org> <200904112102.57302.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83skkeopab.fsf@gnu.org> <m3ab6ko5y0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2

> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:48:39 -0600
> 
> This patch could easily have gone in without finger-pointing.  I'm
> sure whoever neglected to update the prototypes did not do it on
> purpose.

I'm sorry.  I saw the compilation error, recalled the painful argument
about the prototypes, and jumped to the wrong conclusions.

In any case, I didn't mean any finger-pointing, just to express a mild
annoyance that something that was so painfully agreed upon didn't
happen.  As you might imagine, it didn't take more than a few seconds
to fix the problem, so the annoyance couldn't last too long.