From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-63860-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8601 invoked by alias); 20 May 2009 17:22:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 8592 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2009 17:22:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:22:42 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KJY00H00DDPW000@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:22:38 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.115.215]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KJY00CRVDLNFM40@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:22:35 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:22:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [rfa][testsuite] Consolidade Python test functions in lib/gdb.exp.
In-reply-to: <1242832233.6644.2.camel@hactar>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83fxezpu3m.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1242621476.8085.4.camel@hactar> <83ws8ep9gq.fsf@gnu.org> <1242744639.10143.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090519145908.GA24773@caradoc.them.org> <83k54cq4oe.fsf@gnu.org> <1242771692.6232.1.camel@hactar> <83hbzgpixf.fsf@gnu.org> <1242789977.6232.21.camel@hactar> <20090520033939.GA31983@caradoc.them.org> <1242825492.6644.0.camel@hactar> <20090520145859.GA9276@caradoc.them.org> <1242832233.6644.2.camel@hactar>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2

> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, tromey@redhat.com,
>         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:10:33 -0300
> 
> Ah, I didn't think of python-frame.c. It didn't exist when I did this
> back then. :-(

There are also value.c and utils.c.

> The right solution then is to make them not share a namespace.

Alternatively, we could use the following band-aid:

    python-cmd.c        -> pycmd.c
    python-frame.c      -> pyframe.c
    python-function.c   -> pyfunction.c
    python-internal.h   -> pyinternal.h
    python-utils.c      -> pyutils.c
    python-value.c      -> pyvalue.c
    python.c            -> python.c
    python.h            -> python.h

WDYT?