From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15626 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 16:37:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15568 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 16:37:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_DNSBL_BUMP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_Z,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:36:58 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5M00B008T44S00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:36:56 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5M009TA8TJXZO0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:36:56 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:37:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] New agent command 'kill' and used by gdbserver In-reply-to: <201206142250.01331.yao@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83fw9xyhmv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1339246002-1987-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1339246002-1987-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <4FD76ADB.7090302@redhat.com> <201206142250.01331.yao@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00476.txt.bz2 > From: Yao Qi > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:50:01 +0800 > CC: > > --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo > +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo > @@ -33585,6 +33585,10 @@ for an error > > @end table > > +@item close > +Closes the in-process agent. This command is sent when @value{GDBN} or GDBserver > +is about to kill inferiors. > + Shouldn't there be a "Reply" section, as with other commands? If not, this part is OK with me. Thanks.