Re: [PATCH] gdb: improve usage strings

Mike Frysinger
2012-08-11T18:08:17Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 663 bytes --]

On Saturday 11 August 2012 13:52:24 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> > so it seems like finish *does* secretly accept options, but in this case
> > it's trying to be secret about it rather than someone just didn't fully
> > document it. or i read the "arg" parsing logic above incorrectly.
>
> Isn't that the case of "finish &" ?

i'm not familiar with async behavior in gdb. is it something that applies to
all commands, or just to a select few ? if the latter, should we still
document it in the usage string ?
Usage: finish [&]
if the former, seems weird that every command would parse it itself ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]