From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5174 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2013 09:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5122 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2013 09:24:26 -0000 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:24:26 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSP00A0063RZH00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:24:23 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSP00AUH64MNIA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:24:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:24:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Trust readonly sections if target has memory protection In-reply-to: <52299B13.3020507@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83fvtimhfl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1378432920-7731-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1378432920-7731-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83siximqmk.fsf@gnu.org> <52299B13.3020507@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:06:27 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: > > On 09/06/2013 02:05 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Is it possible NOT to split documentation changes between changesets, > > when they are all parts of the same patch series? Reviewing changes > > piecemeal like that is extremely inconvenient and error-prone, > > especially since you never tell in the beginning that the > > documentation changes are split. TIA. > > > > OK. I re-org the patches and move all doc-related changes into one > patch. Not needed for this patch, only for the future. Thanks. > The patch below addresses all your comments on doc. OK.