From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115671 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2016 06:14:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115638 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2016 06:14:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:830, love, hear X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:14:36 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNfT-0002yp-NC for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:14:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNfT-0002yl-Jz; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:14:31 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2756 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNfS-0000UE-Gp; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:14:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83funuxjyi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: tom@tromey.com, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <072d729d-8e32-024e-4aab-09f6b4d5e3d9@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:43:19 +0100) Subject: Re: Go C++11? (was: Re: [RFA 09/22] Remove make_cleanup_restore_current_ui) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1474949330-4307-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1474949330-4307-10-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <2f79a489b9090701f15fc04e0017c236@simark.ca> <87y41xd0dt.fsf@tromey.com> <1f5898b8-6be9-48e6-4312-72ec90e7810e@redhat.com> <87insxmbnd.fsf@tromey.com> <2855e2ec-46dc-71b7-9943-8edaebcbef90@redhat.com> <8337k0aicw.fsf@gnu.org> <6f27db2e-4b88-b72a-5836-080c3583eb7f@redhat.com> <83r37k8ifg.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgxs8fyj.fsf@gnu.org> <9d9dca17-56a6-6c0a-44bb-efc425f24d8d@redhat.com> <83k2dc8ef4.fsf@gnu.org> <685ed94c-fd1b-6b0a-4fe0-0418966b184f@redhat.com> <072d729d-8e32-024e-4aab-09f6b4d5e3d9@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 > Cc: tom@tromey.com, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:43:19 +0100 > > Sooo.... Shall we proceed with the straw man proposal and > apply the patches at [2] (enable -std=gnu+11 on gcc >= 4.8)? > > [1] - https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00496.html > [2] - https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00336.html > > Do people feel this hasn't been sufficiently discussed? > > If we can do this now, I'll happily drop my shim in favor of > jumping to C++11 quicker! Maybe it'll find a home in gcc. :-) > > I'd love to hear feedback. You don't really want to hear more from me on this, do you? Because what I can say is quite clear. Right? Thanks.