From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18848 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2019 18:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18840 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2019 18:36:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:36:20 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5adu-0003aT-Ps; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:36:18 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4845 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h5adr-0004WX-EB; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:36:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83ftrlwdps.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: palves@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87sgvltnkg.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Sun, 17 Mar 2019 11:31:27 -0600) Subject: Re: GDB 8.2.90 available for testing References: <20190227055112.4A5E782D7B@joel.gnat.com> <835zt3kbjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1hae23l.fsf@tromey.com> <835zstbyhb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhq5f5j3.fsf@tromey.com> <83sgvw8tjv.fsf@gnu.org> <878sxhfjk7.fsf@tromey.com> <83wokxwl3a.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgvltnkg.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , palves@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 11:31:27 -0600 > > >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Eli> However, your change gave me an idea, and I think I came up with a bit > Eli> better fix, see below (the patch is again the current HEAD). With > Eli> that, the original problem seems to be fixed, and we still don't > Eli> produce redundant lines in the command window. WDYT? > > I think as long as it works, it is good. Thanks. So okay to push to both branches?