From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35238 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2020 18:23:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 35225 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2020 18:23:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:87y2su5, H*MI:sk:87y2su5, HX-Languages-Length:541 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:23:40 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5ZRB-00037Y-Aw; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:23:37 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2543 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j5ZRA-0005DR-RP; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:23:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83ftf2iiqm.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: midenok@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87y2su5whg.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:04:59 -0700) Subject: Re: GDB 9 TUI mode broken References: <835zg5m7ib.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu9aj1pj.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2su5whg.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , midenok@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:04:59 -0700 > > This code is all different on git master. I don't have the master built here: can you seed if the original recipe, i.e. "winheight src +8", works on master as expected? If so, only the GDB 9 branch needs fixing. > Your patch looks reasonable to me. Thanks, I will finish it off as suggested, and submit a full patch for review.