From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA103857005 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:18:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2AA103857005 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwJhV-0008Qq-DY; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:18:29 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1467 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jwJhU-0002Rg-Nl; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:18:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:18:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83ft9qk6l3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Alan.Hayward@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.spickett@linaro.org In-Reply-To: <20200715194513.16641-23-luis.machado@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado via Gdb-patches on Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:45:12 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] Add NEWS entry. References: <20200715194513.16641-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20200715194513.16641-23-luis.machado@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:18:31 -0000 > Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:45:12 -0300 > From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches > Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.spickett@linaro.org > > +* The "x" command supports the 'm' modifier to display allocation tags for > + a particular memory range. > + > +* The "print" command will display memory tag mismatches for addresses and > + pointers, if memory tagging is supported by the architecture. "Supports" vs "will display". Please use "displays" in the latter. This part is OK with that nit fixed, thanks.