From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29938 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 17:11:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2009 17:11:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:11:14 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KII00I00ICILL00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:11:07 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.175.232]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KII00IEIIEHXWW0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:11:07 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] Set the default of disassemble-next-line to off In-reply-to: To: Hui Zhu Cc: tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83eivkhavi.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00593.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:42:36 +0800 > From: Hui Zhu > Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , > "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:16, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: > > > > Hui> -If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine\n\ > > Hui> +If AUTO, or there's no line info to determine\n\ > > Hui>  the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next\n\ > > Hui>  instruction instead."), > > > > It seems to me that this should read: > > > >    If AUTO, and there's no line info to determine [...] > > If auto: > if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction. > if this is line inof, it will output nothing. > > If on: > if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction. > if this is line inof, it will display disassembly of the next source > line whenexecution of the program being debugged stops. > > If off, > it will output nothing. > > > I have no idea to write it clear. > Could you please help me with it? I already suggested a change in the doc string, see http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00416.html I didn't see any responses. If the text I suggest there is clear, I will fix the manual as well.