From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15234 invoked by alias); 20 May 2009 17:42:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 15222 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2009 17:42:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 17:42:48 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KJY00K00DWVMW00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:41:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.115.215]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KJY006DVEHLN890@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 May 2009 20:41:45 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:42:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [rfc] Remove current_gdbarch register handling from symbol readers In-reply-to: <200905201503.n4KF3ofO011061@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83eiujpt7n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200905201503.n4KF3ofO011061@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:03:50 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > > this patch removes most of the remaining instances of current_gdbarch > from the symbol readers. Thanks. > Tested on powerpc64-linux and amd64-linux (also with stabs). What about the COFF related parts? were they tested? I recently found a few places where COFF support suffered some serious bitrot, and I think that's because it is not tested enough. Is there some Posix platform that supports COFF, and where we could run the test suite?