From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29578 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2009 06:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29569 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Aug 2009 06:51:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:51:23 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KP400B00LMUHF00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:51:20 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.144.38]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KP400MPSLPJ1680@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:51:20 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:24:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFC: Mark outer frames In-reply-to: <20090828213237.GA9175@caradoc.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83eiqvaz9t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20090828213237.GA9175@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:32:37 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > gdb/doc/ > * gdbint.texinfo (Unwinding the Frame ID): Reference outer_frame_id. This part is OK, but the code still has null_frame_id, so perhaps deleting it entirely here is not really right. How about adding a sentence explaining how null_frame_id differs from outer_frame_id?