From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30288 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2010 10:42:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 30278 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jan 2010 10:42:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:42:42 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVK00300DLRLO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:41:57 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVK00MOEDPXOVC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:41:57 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:42:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Update the "Start of New Year Procedure" In-reply-to: <20100101091009.GI548@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83eimaf6k7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100101091009.GI548@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:10:09 +0400 > From: Joel Brobecker > > I would like to clarify a little bit the process needed to update > the copyright headers. Patch attached. Thanks. > +Run the @code{copyright.sh} script to add the new year in the copyright > +notices of most source files. This script requires Emacs 22 or later to > +be installed. It's better to put copyright.sh in @file, not in @code. > +@itemize @bullet > + @item @file{*.s} > + @item @file{*.f} > + @item @file{*.f90} > + @item @file{*.igen} > + @item @file{*.ac} > + @item @file{*.texi} > + @item @file{*.texinfo} > + @item @file{*.tex} > + @item @file{*.defs} > + @item @file{*.1} > +@end itemize Although this format is permitted, the canonical way of writing an itemized list is to have @item on its own line: @item @file{*.s} @item @file {*.f} ... Did you have a good reason for not using the canonical form? If not, I'd prefer to use it, although I won't object to what you did as well. Also, perhaps it is worthwhile to spell out the language for each file type. Again, that's not a blocking comment. Otherwise, okay with me.