From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20643 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2013 18:53:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20632 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2013 18:53:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:53:07 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJP00E00TPV6V00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:52:50 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJP00EVDTS12K20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:52:50 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:58:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Compilation failure for mingw64 target (was New ARI warning Fri Mar 15 02:02:12 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-03-15-gmt) In-reply-to: <201303151436.39870.vapier@gentoo.org> To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com, pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, yao@codesourcery.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ehfg4hrx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20130315020212.GA23545@sourceware.org> <87hakczfp4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83ip4s4ixc.fsf@gnu.org> <201303151436.39870.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 > From: Mike Frysinger > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:36:38 -0400 > Cc: Tom Tromey , pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, yao@codesourcery.com > > > > There's a gnulib mkdir module. > > > > That's another possibility, yes. Although for such a simple job I'm > > not sure the gnulib complexity is justified. But I don't object to > > using the gnulib mkdir module. > > we pulled in gnulib specifically to avoid growing a custom compat layer in gdb. > seems like adding it to the existing gnulib list is pretty trivial work. I said I didn't object, didn't I?