From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27089 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2014 06:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27071 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2014 06:57:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:57:47 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6K00G00Z5YAM00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:57:43 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6K00GOSZC3AJ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:57:39 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:57:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v1] Add xmethod documentation and NEWS entry In-reply-to: To: Siva Chandra Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83egz6a3ab.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ha439l4m.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:43:52 -0700 > From: Siva Chandra > Cc: gdb-patches > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12 -0700 > >> From: Siva Chandra > >> > >> The attached patch is almost the same as v19 except that it adds a > >> small note about the xmethod example mentioning that xmethod in the > >> example is slightly a different version of C++ operator+. > > > > Could you please identify the addition explicitly? I'm not sure which > > note did you have in mind. > > Sorry for not being explicit. The part I am referring to is in the > node "Writing an Xmethod". It is in the "@noindent" piece right after > the first C++ example listing. OK, that's fine. Thanks.