From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19916 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2015 18:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19897 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2015 18:02:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mtaout29.012.net.il Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il (HELO mtaout29.012.net.il) (80.179.55.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:02:13 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIA00H006YDU600@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:58:02 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIA00CCB78QZM50@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:58:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:02:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for embedding scripts in .debug_gdb_scripts. In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83egqu1u69.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppaf3oe6.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:15:35 -0800 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > >> +* Python/Guile scripting > >> + > >> +** GDB now supports auto-loading of Python/Guile scripts contained in the > >> + special section named `.debug_gdb_scripts'. > > > > I think we should tell here on what systems/targets this is supported. > > Otherwise, the NEWS entry is OK. > > The previous news entry didn't, and I'm following that. So we have no hope for ever fixing past mistakes? > > Let's be consistent here" "null", lower-case and with 2 'l'. This is > > just a plain English word, not an acronym or a C symbol. > > NULL is a typo, thanks for catching that. > I'm just following usage elsewhere in gdb.texinfo, > and I like this choice. So we have no hope for ever fixing past mistakes? > >> +The rest of the entry, up to the trailing NUL byte, > > ^^^ > > "null" > > Copied from gdb.texinfo. > Plus we've had this conversation before. :-) > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00892.html > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00894.html So we have no hope for ever fixing past mistakes?