From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F69B3954430 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:14:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3F69B3954430 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjN2D-0005o3-I5; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:14:21 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2595 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jjN2C-000087-Ht; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:14:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:14:04 +0300 Message-Id: <83eeql68yr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi Cc: jg@jguk.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <5229410d-e153-8c28-dbd9-d8cc5d25847b@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:59:48 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: texinfo remove broken links Previous and Up from contents References: <9a670cec-ee22-8d98-47d5-4876b9ca7c58@jguk.org> <83a71qlzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <831rmo70wx.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7vi5nz0.fsf@gnu.org> <5229410d-e153-8c28-dbd9-d8cc5d25847b@simark.ca> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:14:23 -0000 > Cc: jg@jguk.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:59:48 -0400 > > > Fine with me, but where's the final patch, please? > > > > You said the original patch was fine with the ChangeLog entry fixed (adding a period), > then said that it could be fixed by whoever pushed the patch, so I thought you could > do just that. Yes, I just got confused with what was the final version, and wanted to be sure I do TRT. > Anyway, I just fixed it and pushed the patch. Thanks, and sorry for my confusion.