From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23A83861024 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 02:31:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F23A83861024 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqp0s-0006Ue-FP; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 22:31:46 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3715 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jqp0q-0004vs-Lk; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 22:31:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 05:31:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83eepuy7e9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20200701192913.GD5340@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:29:13 -0700) Subject: Re: Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW References: <83a70l20dn.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftaczfvl.fsf@gnu.org> <20200701192913.GD5340@adacore.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:31:48 -0000 > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:29:13 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/lists/archive/users/2020-June/000541.html > > > > It currently makes me unable to run the built GDB on Windows XP, but I > > can run it on newer versions of Windows. So this is not a blocking > > problem. > > I thought we dropped support for Windows XP? I think that is > a reasonable assumption, considering how long ago MS dropped > support for that version. Which is why I said this should not block the branching. (My main Windows development machine runs Windows XP, so it's important to me, but that's me.) P.S. I don't think GDB dropped support for XP, it's MinGW64 that did.