From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id zYZqDo0QFmFPCgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:26:21 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2A8281EDFB; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:26:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9411EA7E for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0233889803 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:26:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D0233889803 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1628835977; bh=3yPus46/MTroB44s+flD7N8argO97ZujmlzJ2O+F0C0=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=GAdXqsW9NJNg9B1VhjvuGLCMkTy9uYDJ6VdAj0g8SZoJ0YRxK7HB/zeFYMaEh/C7n IPLbKExpjcgbWJeIDAO1zdnN1f6MvFGQoGEYlEiPo/ZrEZDHYq4MQlvyOBkxAa548E y4maNHkAypQaZ1nFm5gfOrz1bXO/rwKftJGCcOcQ= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E8133858C3B for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:25:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2E8133858C3B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mEQdg-0006VZ-Ne; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:25:56 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2851 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mEQdd-0003Ns-Co; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:25:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:25:38 +0300 Message-Id: <83eeaxdfod.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <8735recsq3.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:29:08 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update documentation to mention Pygments References: <20210812183952.3509102-1-tromey@adacore.com> <83fsvecx6f.fsf@gnu.org> <8735recsq3.fsf@tromey.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:29:08 -0600 > > >> Philippe Blain pointed out that the gdb documentation does not mention > >> that Pygments may be used for source highlighting. This patch updates > >> the docs to reflect how highlighting is actually done. > > Eli> OK, thanks. > > Thanks. I'm going to backport this to the gdb-11 branch. Fine with me, thanks.