From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: Add gdb_test_multiple_name variable
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 17:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83e83e2a-c0f8-5721-ad76-8b842aaad390@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001172850.29867-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
On 10/1/19 10:28 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> After this patch you can now write this:
>
> gdb_test_multiple "print foo" "test foo" {
> -re "expected output 1" {
> pass $gdb_test_multiple_name
> }
> -re "expected output 2" {
> fail $gdb_test_multiple_name
> }
> }
OMG, why didn't *I* think of that!?!
> The $gdb_test_multiple_name is setup by gdb_test_multiple, and cleaned
> up once the test has completed. Nested calls to gdb_test_multiple are
> supported, though $gdb_test_multiple_name will only ever contain the
> inner most test message (which is probably what you want).
Your patch looks good to me (but I am not a maintainer), but I wanted to
ask if you considered using a stack to more robustly solve the nesting
problem? It might be unnecessary today -- even overkill -- but I
would think it is much easier on the eyes.
We have such support in the test suite already. See
testsuite/lib/data-structures.exp. [I am not suggesting any
changes, just trying to raise awareness for ::Stack et al usage
in the test suite.]
Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 17:29 Andrew Burgess
2019-10-01 17:41 ` Keith Seitz [this message]
2019-10-02 13:03 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-10-02 17:17 ` Keith Seitz
2019-10-03 10:02 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-10-01 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-06 8:24 ` Tom de Vries
2019-10-07 10:28 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83e83e2a-c0f8-5721-ad76-8b842aaad390@redhat.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox