From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-66765-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30304 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2009 08:08:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 30294 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2009 08:08:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:08:29 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KPU00M00ML1T900@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:08:25 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.163]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KPU00752MM0KW50@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:08:25 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:08:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec
In-reply-to: <m3vdjpfap4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83d45w1t6u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3r5uejz4y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19113.58116.381538.294631@totara.tehura.co.nz> <m363bpgti0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83hbv91a2i.fsf@gnu.org> <m3vdjpfap4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:11:51 -0600
> 
> @table @samp
> @item name
> The name of the varobj.
> 
> ... but existing MI documentation uses @table @var.

Then you are right: "@table @var" is against the conventions.  Sorry I
didn't see that earlier.