From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71021-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11015 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2010 18:14:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 11003 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2010 18:14:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:14:04 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZ600L00LAC6100@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:13:42 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.214.230]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZ600J1JLAS3I90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:13:42 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:14:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support x86 pseudo registers
In-reply-to: <20100312162949.GA22104@caradoc.them.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, msnyder@vmware.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83d3z92ysk.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20100301170152.GA20106@intel.com> <201003120423.07852.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83ljdy0wn9.fsf@gnu.org> <201003121526.37646.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83iq9134rm.fsf@gnu.org> <20100312162949.GA22104@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:30:04 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> 	hjl.tools@gmail.com, msnyder@vmware.com
> 
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Maybe, but frankly I don't really understand what it says, exactly.
> > Does it mean that if the name does clash with the architecture, the
> > architecture's meaning is used?
> 
> I think that's what was intended.

Then maybe we should say when there's conflict, the generic name
_might_ be unavailable.