From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73806-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28764 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2010 07:34:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 28752 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2010 07:34:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:34:41 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4700E0090S7Q00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:34:38 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.88.125]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4700D8C91Q2030@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:34:38 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:34:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prec: add a switch for memory doesn't record query
In-reply-to: <AANLkTilqZOBe0hrMwttoOerPeKAzloRcVic8fbN2rJMB@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83d3voiyjv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <AANLkTikKW5Bh6uxL5rJ-3UdU3VfTDiz6pZud5GJa3gTB@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilqZOBe0hrMwttoOerPeKAzloRcVic8fbN2rJMB@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:59:49 +0800
> 
> Some words in the doc is not very well.  Did some small change.

Thanks.

> +Control the behavior when PREC cannot record memory change of next
> +instruction.  If ON, @value{GDBN} will query when it cannot record
> +memory change of next instruction.

First, please don't use "PREC", this is not a term we use in the
manual.

Second, I think a short explanation of why this could happen is in
order.

> +If this option is OFF(the default), @value{GDBN} will auto ignore this
> +issue.  It can handle it with itself.

This is too mysterious.  I think we should have at least some
explanation of what this auto handling does.  Otherwise, the reader
will not be able to decide whether to set this on or not.