From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7067 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2011 15:53:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 7059 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2011 15:53:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:53:00 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LPO00I0042NGR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:52:53 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.94.185]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LPO00ETV442BUQ1@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:52:51 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:53:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce header (jit-reader.h.in) and modify build system. In-reply-to: <4E415691.9040703@playingwithpointers.com> To: Sanjoy Das Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83d3gezinf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1312903509-25132-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1312903509-25132-2-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> <4E415691.9040703@playingwithpointers.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:17:29 +0530 > From: Sanjoy Das > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Hi! > > > I understand that jit.c will be compiled unconditionally on the x86 > > architectures, is that right? If so, would it be possible to rename > > jit-header.h.in to jit-header.in, or some other name that doesn't > > violate the file-naming restrictions on 8+3 (a.k.a. DOS) filesystems? > > Handling such files that need to be used while compiling the DJGPP > > port of GDB is a nuisance. > > Shouldn't be a problem, I'll correct this in the next iteration. Thank you.