From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17578 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2013 07:00:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17565 invoked by uid 89); 14 Sep 2013 07:00:18 -0000 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:00:18 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MT300400SR8T000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:00:15 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MT30044ASSEGUB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:00:15 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:00:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Introduce new $_isvoid() convenience function In-reply-to: To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83d2obhoqy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a9jhi3h0.fsf@gnu.org> <83li30h5z0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ioy4h5cl.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00418.txt.bz2 > From: Sergio Durigan Junior > Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:17:03 -0300 > > On Friday, September 13 2013, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Sergio Durigan Junior > >> Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > >> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:40:52 -0300 > >> > >> > This is fine, but I would also include an example with $_exitcode. > >> > >> I intend to expand this explanation when I resubmit the patch for > >> $_exitsignal. In fact, I will add another example showing the behavior > >> of $_exitsignal and $_exitcode. But if you wish, I can add $_exitcode > >> here as well. > > > > It would be best to have the explanation in both places, or at least a > > cross-reference from one to the other. > > WDYT of this version? This is great, thanks.