From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20223 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2013 08:36:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20209 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2013 08:36:44 -0000 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:36:44 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MTF00K0013NKT00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:36:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MTF00KLD18X6UB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:36:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:36:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patchv3 1/2] Remove a.out NetBSD and OpenBSD hosta and targets In-reply-to: <20130920074722.GA5684@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83d2o3lwiy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20130919200212.GA32111@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130919202622.GA2940@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130919210134.GA3314@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83li2skkja.fsf@gnu.org> <20130920074722.GA5684@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:47:22 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:40:57 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > NEWS is still OK. > > I wanted to fix s/Removed hosts/Removed native configurations/ as I found > later such wording there from the past, I guess that is better / also OK. Yes.