From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10112 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2014 17:29:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10101 invoked by uid 89); 28 Mar 2014 17:29:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout27.012.net.il Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il (HELO mtaout27.012.net.il) (80.179.55.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:29:35 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N3500500PPOAF00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:26:39 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N3500PYLPSF4N40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:26:39 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:29:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "PC register is not available" issue In-reply-to: <20140328125955.GC4030@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83d2h6fczk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83txawa9wk.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318161608.GD4282@adacore.com> <83pplja2h9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318165413.GE4282@adacore.com> <834n2kztfw.fsf@gnu.org> <20140327125646.GA4030@adacore.com> <83k3bfy1ws.fsf@gnu.org> <20140328125955.GC4030@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 05:59:55 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > + if (killed) > > + SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context); > > + else > > + CHECK (SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context)); > > Rather than duplicate the call to SetThreadContext, perhaps > another way of doing it would be: > > DWORD status; > > status = SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context); > if (!killed) > CHECK (status) Fine with me.