From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ubN/GD29SGCCIQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:13 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5220C1EF78; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:13 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D431E590 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEE0384BC33; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:36:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7BEE0384BC33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615379771; bh=dLLysNhhe8c4LDvPy/Fw2kCTwQSxK4kjQyY+82P4p30=; h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=mOPuRVtwlbP+nw3FUX729+Vx16NEQaiGjVDYTHWS0d49MEsTaONUQTmUI0EBnBgpv oCY+uViiGVWnOam7RoLQgHKEriGmz2CBO57zcARFymAAXnZfqdW3EP5MN6BkzKAYnf Dsnmfp6mTF/9tQgf/kVsGYzBkrUhWStjpWp1Djj8= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1602384BC33 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:36:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E1602384BC33 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJy4P-0001Xx-8e for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:09 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3358 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJy4O-0003k1-IN for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:36:06 +0200 Message-Id: <83czw7p4nd.fsf@gnu.org> To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Subtle problems with "info sharedlibrary" on MS-Windows X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" I recently saw 2 strange issues with "info sharedlibrary" on MS-Windows: . Some DLLs loaded explicitly via LoadLibrary don't show. I stepped through the code which loads them and verified they load successfully; moreover, Process Explorer does show them loaded. But they are nowhere to be seem in "info sharedlibrary"s display. . The "From" address shown by "info sharedlibrary" is different from the base address at which the DLL is loaded: it is 4KB higher than the base address. Are these problems known? I searched Bugzilla, but didn't find anything pertinent. TIA