From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62743-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13275 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2009 21:45:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 13211 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2009 21:45:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:44:53 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHR00F002V6O600@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:42:44 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.240.236]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHR00FFN2Z7HVJ0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:42:44 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:45:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Python pretty-printing [3/6]
In-reply-to: <m3tz50z1g7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83bpr85ehv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3bprebws2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <ufxgpixbv.fsf@gnu.org> <m3tz50z1g7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2

> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:52:08 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> Tom> +@item bitpos
> Tom> +This attribute is not available for @code{static} fields.  For
> Tom> +non-@code{static} fields, the value is the bit position of the field.
> 
> Eli> What are "static fields"?  Should that be explained here?
> 
> A static field is a C++ (and Java, and probably others) concept.  I
> don't think we should explain it, we can just refer to C++.

Here and elsewhere, I guess the best we can do now is for you to
mention the language(s) you know about, and someone else will have to
complete the information when it is available.

Thanks.