From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3161 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 18:55:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 3150 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 18:55:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:31 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KQQ00800XPZIF00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:55:28 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.188.180]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KQQ009CHXWG7V00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:55:28 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle CTRL_BREAK_EVENT in ctrl_c_handler In-reply-to: <000001ca40d6$9ac3c260$d04b4720$@u-strasbg.fr> To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83bpktr336.fsf@gnu.org> References: <002001ca3acf$a0d8bb40$e28a31c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <83hbuwurzc.fsf@gnu.org> <000601ca3b9a$3cbbe670$b633b350$@u-strasbg.fr> <83ocoxsl83.fsf@gnu.org> <000001ca40d6$9ac3c260$d04b4720$@u-strasbg.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00929.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Cc: > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:29:38 +0200 > > Could we apply both > the patch to windows-nat.c and to docs to branch > or is it too late? If/when the patch to windows-nat.c is approved for the branch, you have my approval to commit the docs. I don't have a clear idea how safe is it to commit the changes to windows-nat.c to the branch, sorry.