From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82383-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12951 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 16:40:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 12879 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 16:40:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:40:15 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOL00E00A9OLD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:40:04 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOL00E09AAQKA10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:40:03 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:04:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
In-reply-to: <CAA18ubLBZseSxqjWSk1jH7OeZi06K_o75HKc0CN-_iCAjQ5boA@mail.gmail.com>
To: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83bowq6x7f.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <BANLkTinD+9_Mkug8o2VhZ03L6XSriL_RKQ@mail.gmail.com> <m3oc1kfheh.fsf@redhat.com> <20110627160029.GF20676@adacore.com> <m3sjqt67pe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3mxh1oa8a.fsf@redhat.com> <CAA18ubJ10sh3pPDLp4V44qY6r6hLU9RqyDi62KuAAtfXJY7Oug@mail.gmail.com> <834o33qlm9.fsf@gnu.org> <CAA18ubJZK7w51Bmwvy7xYXPvHf7e=bbRbdBOqNvZA-PrXJpUsA@mail.gmail.com> <E1Qdhn8-0000fE-TK@fencepost.gnu.org> <CAA18ubJAvwHt-sq8XN98PhC=LSFXPbcy4P1+AVic-G=MNE7R2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA18ubLBZseSxqjWSk1jH7OeZi06K_o75HKc0CN-_iCAjQ5boA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:16:36 +0400
> From: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
> Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, 
> 	eliz@gnu.org
> 
> Is everything ok? Or what I should change?

I believe the consensus is that "nopath" should be replaced with
"basename".  I like Pedro's suggestion from today to add this option
to the existing "set backtrace" family.