From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 118219 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2017 13:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117777 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2017 13:47:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:908, HReply-to:D*org X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:47:27 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyIcG-0002cr-EY for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:47:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyIcG-0002cn-Ao; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:47:24 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3938 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cyIcF-0003mH-Mf; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:47:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83bms1ka9s.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1492003875-25394-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:15 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Move DJGPP/go32 bits to their own tdep file Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1492003875-25394-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:15 +0100 > > I posit that this makes them easier to find. > > The other day while working on the wchar_t patch, I had a bit of > trouble finding the DJGPP/go32 tdep bits. My initial reaction was > looking for a go32-specific tdep file, but there's none. Thanks, but why single out go32? The comment in i386-tdep.c says: /* There are a few i386 architecture variants that differ only slightly from the generic i386 target. For now, we don't give them their own source file, but include them here. As a consequence, they'll always be included. */ If we are going to have a separate tdep file for such architectures, let's do it for SVR4 as well. P.S. How come functions and other symbols are looked for via file names, and not via TAGS?