From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11754 invoked by alias); 2 May 2019 16:46:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11746 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2019 16:46:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 May 2019 16:46:12 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMEqY-00058P-Or; Thu, 02 May 2019 12:46:10 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3165 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMEqY-0000Mv-6Z; Thu, 02 May 2019 12:46:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 16:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83bm0kpzy9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Kevin Buettner CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, simark@simark.ca In-reply-to: <20190502085919.63b2d520@f29-4.lan> (message from Kevin Buettner on Thu, 2 May 2019 08:59:19 -0700) Subject: Re: The 'cold' function attribute and GDB References: <83wojaovbp.fsf@gnu.org> <077aee8c-7bef-bad6-a6a1-e69f116cc18b@simark.ca> <20190501195113.69aea752@f30-4.lan> <20190502002644.5e40b489@f29-4.lan> <83lfzoq3ly.fsf@gnu.org> <20190502085919.63b2d520@f29-4.lan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 08:59:19 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, simark@simark.ca > > > This is with GCC 8.2.0, btw. > > I'll give this a try. > > I have GCC 8.3.1 and 9.0.1 readily available. Do you think it's > important to use 8.2.0 ? No, I don't think so, not up front. If you will get different results, we might consider this, but I won't bother with downgrading at this time. Thanks.