From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id aG4WCczm7F9SEwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:45:00 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1FEC41F0AA; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:45:00 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C52B1E965 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:44:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51253851C25; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:44:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E51253851C25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1609361098; bh=utYBf13j2POtUfQr+KPHHOBWK1YdTw8LU/UAneXcT28=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=QVo7IHrBiWSEqe/n/r7lc/KGhkyaqdDn+3XWIEK0AG+6bTqUB38Maq9Jdom9/cfZy DxCsDcPumWdqVn37IzWM/clct5wmrBraKs8D5CzDHbw/wMt00Or64FUyAn3i4K0uUr jNMEBxvJSAe9oMUeeiEBOpIc/RRzQhrn/cau631Q= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787B53851C25 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:44:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 787B53851C25 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kuiL1-0003Tp-Vu; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:44:56 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4971 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kuiL1-0004OV-CD; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:44:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:44:51 +0200 Message-Id: <83blebhvlo.fsf@gnu.org> To: Luis Machado In-Reply-To: <20201230153916.1586725-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> (message from Luis Machado via Gdb-patches on Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:39:14 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions References: <20201230153916.1586725-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20201230153916.1586725-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:39:14 -0300 > From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches > Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org > > +If the architecture supports memory tagging, the @code{print} command will > +display pointer/memory tag mismatches if what is being printed is a pointer > +or reference type. @xref{Memory Tagging}. ^^ Two spaces between sentences, please. OK with this nit fixed. Thanks.