From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65334-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5949 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2009 18:02:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 5559 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jul 2009 18:02:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:01:54 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KMK00900VB5GZ00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:01:51 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.249.41]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KMK0018BVF2YE60@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:01:51 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:50:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA: make test suite transcripts
In-reply-to: <m3k52g1mht.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ab3cxvqn.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3ocrtn65b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83ws6hy83d.fsf@gnu.org> <m3k52g1mht.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2

> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:22:38 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> The documentation needs a review.
> 
> Eli> Thanks.  The documentation patch is approved subject to the same
> Eli> comments as for your previous patch to gdbint.texinfo.
> 
> Thanks.  BTW, this sort of detail work would be simpler if the manuals
> were internally consistent.

True.  Maybe I will find some time to do that.

> Anyway, later I decided that it is preferable to use a DejaGNU
> variable, instead of an environment variable.  So, the text changed.
> Let me know what you think.

Fine with me.